For more than 30 years, Big Telecom has promised to bridge the “Digital Divide” by replacing the old copper wire connections for telephone and internet with fast and reliable fiber broadband to the office and the home for all.[i]  In exchange for delivering fiber optics connections that are safe, the companies have received subsidies, lax regulations, and reductions in regulations. Captured federal agencies support Big Telecom. Instead of fiber, the industries have often substituted cheaper, inferior, and unsafe wireless services and have used these financial windfalls to pay CEOs fat cat salaries and reward shareholders well. Over the years the pattern has persisted, the companies get more revenue to deliver safe, reliable, speedy fiber and instead, the companies use the revenue and then fail to meet the promises again. In 2023, the Biden administration provided another $65 billion subsidy to bring fiber to all.[ii]  But already the companies are failing to deliver on their promises.[iii]  The issue of the proliferation of unsafe wireless services and the failure to deliver on fiber is a part of a larger problem: that of excessive and unhealthy levels of microwave radiation in our environment.

Many report illness from microwave radiation

Virtually everyone has been adversely affected by the excessive exposure to microwave radiation, but most do not connect their symptoms to this radiation.[iv] Some exposures can be limited in the home, as people can choose to avoid radiation emitting devices like Alexa or cordless phones. Fortunately, Wi-Fi in the home can be avoided by using a wired internet connection. Also fortunately, many utilities allow opt outs for avoiding smart meters but usually for an extra fee. More difficulties come with the ever-increasing amounts of wireless outside the home. On the road in a car or on a bike, the radiation is much more difficult to escape. The cell towers, smart meter grids, public Wi-Fi, 5G poles and other radiation sources are an infringement on bodily autonomy. People who wish to avoid this radiation cannot.[v]  The creep of wireless radiation acts much like a health mandate which forces exposure even to those who wish to avoid it.  

Microwave radiation can be unsafe for living things

The wireless industry preys on the lack of awareness as most people do not realize the extensive scientific evidence pointing to ill effects from this microwave radiation on all of life.[vi]  Even people who are receiving excessive exposure in their own homes are victims too, as they are often not informed enough to say that they have been given informed consent. The health impacts of excessive microwave radiation are serious and very extensive.[vii] This radiation harms health at the cellular level and affects energy production in the mitochondria. Exposure to this unnatural radiation contributes to most of the disease in the US, including heart disease, neurological diseases, dementia, cancer, and infertility. 

Why a fiber optic connection is a safer, better choice

Rather than using microwave radiation to carry information to the home, fiber optic cables use laser light that remains confined inside the fibers of the cable.  With fiber, there is no radiation exposure because the laser light is contained within the fiber.  Fiber has high speed, and high capacity to deliver information. It is far more secure and durable than wireless connections. Fiber has every advantage. Of course, it does not preclude the use of Wi-Fi in the home if the consumer so chooses. Containment is a key to safety and lack of containment is one reason why wireless is so unsafe, as it exposes large numbers of people to the radiation. Telecom has received revenues over time in the amount of approximately $1.5 trillion through subsidies, taxes, and consumer fees to put in fiber and has fallen far short on this obligation.

Government agencies are falling down on the job

The 1996 Telecommunications Act tossed responsibility for safety of wireless technology into the hands of the Federal Communications Commission, which is not an agency qualified to assess health safety. The EPA, the FDA, and the CDC are in fact health agencies, and they have all had the opportunity to weigh in on the adverse health impacts of microwave radiation but they have not stepped in to protect the public from this widespread problem. In 1996, the FCC adopted safety guidelines for microwave radiation which were protective for the wireless industry but were far from protective for public health. In 2019, after a 6-year review of the evidence, the FCC failed to improve their faulty guidelines and left them unchanged. The FCC was sued, and the D.C. Circuit Court ordered the FCC to actually do its job and look at the 11,000 plus pages of evidence of harm.[viii]  Yet even as of today, four years later, the FCC has not complied with the court order. 

What can be done?

A state attorney general, or better yet, a group of state attorneys general, could band together to sue the FCC for its failure to comply with the DC Circuit court order and to change the guidelines to protect the public health. These same state attorneys general could sue the major telecom companies to hold them to their promises. In this day and age, it has been recognized that everyone has the right to a safe and reliable telephone and internet connection which many still do not have and has been promised for so many years. It is time to insist on the fiber we already paid for!

__________________

[i] See Kushnick, Bruce, and Rosen, David, “Violations & Egregious Acts: The Trillion Dollar Broadband Scandal,” New York: New Networks Institute, 2020.
[ii] Biden promises internet for all by 2030 – CBS News
[iii] Lumen Defaults on More Than 41,000 RDOF Locations
[iv] Environmental Health Trust | Information About Cell Phone, Wi-Fi, 5G, and Bluetooth Radiation Science Facts on Health Effects – Environmental Health Trust
[v] https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/judge-rules-against-residents-of-massachusetts-town-who-allege-verizon-cell-tower-is-causing-illness/
[vi] HOME | Americans for Responsible Technology
[vii] Physicians for Safe Technology | Wireless Technology and Public Health
[viii] Court Judgment on FCC’s Record Review of 1996 Wireless Radiation Standards – Environmental Health Trust